Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) (C) and New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 52% and 58% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 55/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 5.8 percentage points (58.1% vs 52.3%). New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) covers 88,000 participants.

MetricNew Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
54/100 (C)55/100 (C)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
52.3%58.1%*
Total Assets$34.0B$30.0B
Total Liabilities$65.0B$51.6B*
Unfunded Liability$31.0B$21.6B*
Participants425,00088,000
1-Year Investment Return5.1%5.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorState of New JerseyState of New Jersey

New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 55/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 5.8 percentage points (58.1% vs 52.3%). New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) covers 88,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons