Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) vs Verizon Management Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and Verizon Management Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) grades C while Verizon Management Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 52% vs 96%.

Verizon Management Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Verizon Management Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 98/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 43.3 percentage points (95.6% vs 52.3%). Verizon Management Pension Plan covers 112,363 participants.

MetricNew Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)Verizon Management Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
54/100 (C)98/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
52.3%95.6%*
Total Assets$34.0B$10.9B
Total Liabilities$65.0B$11.4B*
Unfunded Liability$31.0B$505.7M*
Participants425,000112,363
1-Year Investment Return5.1%7.1%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of New JerseyVerizon Communications

Verizon Management Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 98/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 43.3 percentage points (95.6% vs 52.3%). Verizon Management Pension Plan covers 112,363 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons