Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) (A) and Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 97% and 77% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 19.7 percentage points (97.1% vs 77.4%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

MetricNew York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)*70/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
97.1%*77.4%
Total Assets$131.0B$74.0B
Total Liabilities$134.9B$95.6B*
Unfunded Liability$3.9B*$21.6B
Participants433,000405,000
1-Year Investment Return6.8%*6.0%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorState of New YorkState of Georgia

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 19.7 percentage points (97.1% vs 77.4%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

Explore More