Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) vs Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) and Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) grades A while Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) grades D. Funding ratios: 97% vs 45%.

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 52.4 percentage points (97.1% vs 44.7%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

MetricNew York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)*44/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
97.1%*44.7%
Total Assets$131.0B$62.8B
Total Liabilities$134.9B*$140.5B
Unfunded Liability$3.9B*$77.7B
Participants433,000424,000
1-Year Investment Return6.8%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorState of New YorkState of Illinois

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 52.4 percentage points (97.1% vs 44.7%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

Explore More