New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) vs Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) (A) and Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 97% and 77% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 19.8 percentage points (97.1% vs 77.3%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.
| Metric | New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 72/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 97.1%* | 77.3% |
| Total Assets | $131.0B | $84.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $134.9B | $108.7B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.9B* | $24.7B |
| Participants | 433,000 | 375,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.8%* | 5.7% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of New York | State of Oregon |
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 19.8 percentage points (97.1% vs 77.3%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.