Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) (A) and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 97% and 92% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 97.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.

MetricNew York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
82/100 (A)83/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
97.1%*92.1%
Total Assets$131.0B$57.0B
Total Liabilities$134.9B$61.9B*
Unfunded Liability$3.9B*$4.9B
Participants433,000378,000
1-Year Investment Return6.8%6.8%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of New YorkState of Tennessee

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 97.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.

Explore More