Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan (A) and Deere & Company Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 106% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Deere & Company Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 17.8 percentage points (106.2% vs 124.0%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

MetricNorthrop Grumman Pension PlanDeere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
106.2%124.0%*
Total Assets$18.7B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$17.6B$17.0B*
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants106,53183,076
1-Year Investment Return7.3%7.4%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorNorthrop GrummanJohn Deere

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Deere & Company Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 17.8 percentage points (106.2% vs 124.0%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons