Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan vs Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan and Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Northrop Grumman Pension Plan grades A while Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan grades B. Funding ratios: 106% vs 79%.

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.5 percentage points (106.2% vs 78.8%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

MetricNorthrop Grumman Pension PlanLockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*70/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
106.2%*78.8%
Total Assets$18.7B$17.4B
Total Liabilities$17.6B*$22.1B
Unfunded Liability$0*$4.7B
Participants106,53184,564
1-Year Investment Return7.3%*7.1%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorNorthrop GrummanLockheed Martin

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 27.5 percentage points (106.2% vs 78.8%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons