NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.7 percentage points (83.5% vs 76.8%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.
| Metric | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 71/100 (B) | 78/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 76.8% | 83.5%* |
| Total Assets | $77.2B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $100.5B | $98.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.3B | $16.2B* |
| Participants | 370,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.6% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | New York City | University of California |
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.7 percentage points (83.5% vs 76.8%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.