Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.7 percentage points (82.5% vs 64.8%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 61/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5%* | 64.8% |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $58.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $89.5B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B* | $31.5B |
| Participants | 762,000 | 625,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.5% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | State of Colorado |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.7 percentage points (82.5% vs 64.8%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.