Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) and Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) grades A while Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) grades C. Funding ratios: 83% vs 63%.

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 19.4 percentage points (82.5% vs 63.1%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.

MetricOhio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS)Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
80/100 (A)*57/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.5%*63.1%
Total Assets$105.0B$36.2B
Total Liabilities$127.3B$57.4B*
Unfunded Liability$22.3B$21.2B*
Participants762,000245,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.4%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorState of OhioState of Pennsylvania

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS) at 57/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 19.4 percentage points (82.5% vs 63.1%). Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) covers 762,000 participants.

Explore More