Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) vs Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (98.4% vs 82.5%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 86/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.5% | 98.4%* |
| Total Assets | $105.0B | $122.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $127.3B | $124.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.3B | $2.0B* |
| Participants | 762,000 | 665,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | State of Wisconsin |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (98.4% vs 82.5%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.