Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund vs Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund (A) and Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 105% and 83% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 22.6 percentage points (105.1% vs 82.6%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension FundSheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*91/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.1%*82.6%
Total Assets$24.8B$7.5B
Total Liabilities$23.6B$9.1B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$1.6B
Participants230,039148,965
1-Year Investment Return5.7%*5.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorIUOE Local 324Sheet Metal Workers International Association

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 22.6 percentage points (105.1% vs 82.6%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons