Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund vs Michigan State Employees Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund and Michigan State Employees Retirement System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A while Michigan State Employees Retirement System grades C. Funding ratios: 105% vs 62%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan State Employees Retirement System at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 43.3 percentage points (105.1% vs 61.8%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension FundMichigan State Employees Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.1%*61.8%
Total Assets$24.8B$12.2B
Total Liabilities$23.6B$19.7B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$7.5B
Participants230,03988,000
1-Year Investment Return5.7%*5.2%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorIUOE Local 324State of Michigan

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan State Employees Retirement System at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 43.3 percentage points (105.1% vs 61.8%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons