Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund vs Detroit General Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund and Detroit General Retirement System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A while Detroit General Retirement System grades B. Funding ratios: 105% vs 72%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Detroit General Retirement System at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 33.3 percentage points (105.1% vs 71.8%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension FundDetroit General Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*71/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.1%*71.8%
Total Assets$24.8B$2.0B
Total Liabilities$23.6B$2.8B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$780.0M
Participants230,03920,000
1-Year Investment Return5.7%*4.9%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorIUOE Local 324City of Detroit

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Detroit General Retirement System at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 33.3 percentage points (105.1% vs 71.8%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons