Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs Detroit General Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan and Detroit General Retirement System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan grades A while Detroit General Retirement System grades B. Funding ratios: 105% vs 72%.

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Detroit General Retirement System at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 33.5 percentage points (105.3% vs 71.8%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanDetroit General Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*71/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%*71.8%
Total Assets$19.3B$2.0B
Total Liabilities$18.3B$2.8B*
Unfunded Liability$0*$780.0M
Participants141,94820,000
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*4.9%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorFord Motor CompanyCity of Detroit

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Detroit General Retirement System at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 33.5 percentage points (105.3% vs 71.8%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons