Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs General Motors Salaried Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan and General Motors Salaried Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan grades A while General Motors Salaried Pension Plan grades C. Funding ratios: 105% vs 71%.

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Salaried Pension Plan at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 33.8 percentage points (105.3% vs 71.5%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanGeneral Motors Salaried Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%*71.5%
Total Assets$19.3B$468.2M
Total Liabilities$18.3B$655.1M*
Unfunded Liability$0*$187.0M
Participants141,9483,061
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*7.4%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorFord Motor CompanyGeneral Motors

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Salaried Pension Plan at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 33.8 percentage points (105.3% vs 71.5%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons