Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan and General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan grades A while General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan grades B. Funding ratios: 105% vs 77%.

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 65/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 28.2 percentage points (105.3% vs 77.1%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanGeneral Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*65/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%*77.1%
Total Assets$19.3B$739.0M
Total Liabilities$18.3B$958.8M*
Unfunded Liability$0*$219.7M
Participants141,94811,395
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*7.2%
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorFord Motor CompanyGeneral Motors

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 65/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 28.2 percentage points (105.3% vs 77.1%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons