Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund and General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A while General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan grades B. Funding ratios: 105% vs 77%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 65/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 28.1 percentage points (105.1% vs 77.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension FundGeneral Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*65/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.1%*77.1%
Total Assets$24.8B$739.0M
Total Liabilities$23.6B$958.8M*
Unfunded Liability$0*$219.7M
Participants230,03911,395
1-Year Investment Return5.7%7.2%*
Plan Typemultiemployercorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorIUOE Local 324General Motors

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 65/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 28.1 percentage points (105.1% vs 77.1%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons