Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) (C) and General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 60% and 77% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 65/100 (B) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 16.7 percentage points (77.1% vs 60.4%). General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan covers 11,395 participants.

MetricMichigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)65/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
60.4%77.1%*
Total Assets$54.0B$739.0M
Total Liabilities$89.4B$958.8M*
Unfunded Liability$35.4B$219.7M*
Participants465,00011,395
1-Year Investment Return5.3%7.2%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorState of MichiganGeneral Motors

General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 65/100 (B) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 16.7 percentage points (77.1% vs 60.4%). General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan covers 11,395 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons