Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) vs Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) and Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) grades C while Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 60% vs 105%.

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 44.9 percentage points (105.3% vs 60.4%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricMichigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS)Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
60.4%105.3%*
Total Assets$54.0B$19.3B
Total Liabilities$89.4B$18.3B*
Unfunded Liability$35.4B$0*
Participants465,000141,948
1-Year Investment Return5.3%7.5%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of MichiganFord Motor Company

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 44.9 percentage points (105.3% vs 60.4%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons