Skip to main content
PensionRisk

General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan vs General Motors Salaried Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan (B) and General Motors Salaried Pension Plan (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 77% and 71% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 65/100 (B) compared to General Motors Salaried Pension Plan at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 5.6 percentage points (77.1% vs 71.5%). General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan covers 11,395 participants.

MetricGeneral Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension PlanGeneral Motors Salaried Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
65/100 (B)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
77.1%*71.5%
Total Assets$739.0M$468.2M
Total Liabilities$958.8M$655.1M*
Unfunded Liability$219.7M$187.0M*
Participants11,3953,061
1-Year Investment Return7.2%7.4%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorGeneral MotorsGeneral Motors

General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 65/100 (B) compared to General Motors Salaried Pension Plan at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 5.6 percentage points (77.1% vs 71.5%). General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan covers 11,395 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons