Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund vs General Motors Salaried Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund and General Motors Salaried Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund grades A while General Motors Salaried Pension Plan grades C. Funding ratios: 105% vs 71%.

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Salaried Pension Plan at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 33.7 percentage points (105.1% vs 71.5%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

MetricOperating Engineers Local 324 Pension FundGeneral Motors Salaried Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*51/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.1%*71.5%
Total Assets$24.8B$468.2M
Total Liabilities$23.6B$655.1M*
Unfunded Liability$0*$187.0M
Participants230,0393,061
1-Year Investment Return5.7%7.4%*
Plan Typemultiemployercorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorIUOE Local 324General Motors

Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to General Motors Salaried Pension Plan at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 33.7 percentage points (105.1% vs 71.5%). Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund covers 230,039 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons