Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Michigan State Employees Retirement System vs Detroit General Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Michigan State Employees Retirement System (C) and Detroit General Retirement System (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 62% and 72% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Detroit General Retirement System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Michigan State Employees Retirement System at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.0 percentage points (71.8% vs 61.8%). Detroit General Retirement System covers 20,000 participants.

MetricMichigan State Employees Retirement SystemDetroit General Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)71/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
61.8%71.8%*
Total Assets$12.2B$2.0B
Total Liabilities$19.7B$2.8B*
Unfunded Liability$7.5B$780.0M*
Participants88,00020,000
1-Year Investment Return5.2%*4.9%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorState of MichiganCity of Detroit

Detroit General Retirement System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Michigan State Employees Retirement System at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.0 percentage points (71.8% vs 61.8%). Detroit General Retirement System covers 20,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons