Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan vs Michigan State Employees Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan and Michigan State Employees Retirement System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan grades A while Michigan State Employees Retirement System grades C. Funding ratios: 105% vs 62%.

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan State Employees Retirement System at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 43.5 percentage points (105.3% vs 61.8%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

MetricFord Motor Company Retirement PlanMichigan State Employees Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*56/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
105.3%*61.8%
Total Assets$19.3B$12.2B
Total Liabilities$18.3B*$19.7B
Unfunded Liability$0*$7.5B
Participants141,94888,000
1-Year Investment Return7.5%*5.2%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorFord Motor CompanyState of Michigan

Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Michigan State Employees Retirement System at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 43.5 percentage points (105.3% vs 61.8%). Ford Motor Company Retirement Plan covers 141,948 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons