Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) and Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) are meaningfully apart on the PensionRisk pension-health rubric: Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) grades C while Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) grades A. Funding ratios: 58% vs 85%.
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.
Verdict
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 27.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 57.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.
| Metric | Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) | Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 54/100 (C) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 57.8% | 84.8%* |
| Total Assets | $72.0B | $35.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $124.6B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $52.6B | $6.4B* |
| Participants | 518,000 | 372,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.1% | 6.4%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | low |
| Sponsor | State of Pennsylvania | State of Iowa |
Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 27.0 percentage points (84.8% vs 57.8%). Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) covers 372,000 participants.
Explore More
Related Comparisons
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System (SERS)
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan
- Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS)
- Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)
- Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS)
- Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) vs Florida Retirement System (FRS)