Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) and Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) grades C while Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 58% vs 120%.

Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 61.9 percentage points (119.7% vs 57.8%). Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan covers 4,115 participants.

MetricPennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS)Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
54/100 (C)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
57.8%119.7%*
Total Assets$72.0B$418.0M
Total Liabilities$124.6B$349.2M*
Unfunded Liability$52.6B$0*
Participants518,0004,115
1-Year Investment Return5.1%6.2%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of PennsylvaniaAlcoa Corporation

Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 61.9 percentage points (119.7% vs 57.8%). Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan covers 4,115 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons