Skip to main content
PensionRisk

US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits vs Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits (A) and Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 104% and 120% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.6 percentage points (104.1% vs 119.7%). US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits covers 24,055 participants.

MetricUS Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension BenefitsAlcoa Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
104.1%119.7%*
Total Assets$4.2B$418.0M
Total Liabilities$4.0B$349.2M*
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants24,0554,115
1-Year Investment Return5.9%6.2%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorUnited States SteelAlcoa Corporation

US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.6 percentage points (104.1% vs 119.7%). US Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension Benefits covers 24,055 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons