Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System vs Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System and Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System grades C while Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 48% vs 120%.

Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System at 50/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 71.5 percentage points (119.7% vs 48.2%). Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan covers 4,115 participants.

MetricPhiladelphia Municipal Retirement SystemAlcoa Corporation Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
50/100 (C)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
48.2%119.7%*
Total Assets$5.8B$418.0M
Total Liabilities$12.0B$349.2M*
Unfunded Liability$6.2B$0*
Participants63,0004,115
1-Year Investment Return4.8%6.2%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorCity of PhiladelphiaAlcoa Corporation

Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System at 50/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 71.5 percentage points (119.7% vs 48.2%). Alcoa Corporation Retirement Plan covers 4,115 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons