Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) vs Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) (C) and Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 58% and 48% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 54/100 (C) compared to Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System at 50/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 9.6 percentage points (57.8% vs 48.2%). Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) covers 518,000 participants.

MetricPennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS)Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
54/100 (C)*50/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
57.8%*48.2%
Total Assets$72.0B$5.8B
Total Liabilities$124.6B$12.0B*
Unfunded Liability$52.6B$6.2B*
Participants518,00063,000
1-Year Investment Return5.1%*4.8%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorState of PennsylvaniaCity of Philadelphia

Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 54/100 (C) compared to Philadelphia Municipal Retirement System at 50/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 9.6 percentage points (57.8% vs 48.2%). Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) covers 518,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons