Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund vs General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund (A) and General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 83% and 86% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 91/100 (A) compared to General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 3.8 percentage points (82.6% vs 86.4%). Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund covers 148,965 participants.

MetricSheet Metal Workers National Pension FundGeneral Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
91/100 (A)*83/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.6%86.4%*
Total Assets$7.5B$3.0B
Total Liabilities$9.1B$3.5B*
Unfunded Liability$1.6B$470.9M*
Participants148,96535,602
1-Year Investment Return5.3%7.4%*
Plan Typemultiemployercorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorSheet Metal Workers International AssociationGeneral Dynamics

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 91/100 (A) compared to General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 3.8 percentage points (82.6% vs 86.4%). Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund covers 148,965 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons