Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan vs General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan (A) and General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 92% and 86% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 96/100 (A) compared to General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.6 percentage points (92.0% vs 86.4%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 118,601 participants.

MetricBoeing Company Employee Retirement PlanGeneral Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
96/100 (A)*83/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
92.0%*86.4%
Total Assets$25.0B$3.0B
Total Liabilities$27.2B$3.5B*
Unfunded Liability$2.2B$470.9M*
Participants118,60135,602
1-Year Investment Return6.7%7.4%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorBoeing CompanyGeneral Dynamics

Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 96/100 (A) compared to General Dynamics Corporation Pension Plan at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 5.6 percentage points (92.0% vs 86.4%). Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan covers 118,601 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons