Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund (A) and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 83% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 91/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 8.3 percentage points (82.6% vs 74.3%). Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund covers 148,965 participants.

MetricSheet Metal Workers National Pension FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
91/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.6%*74.3%
Total Assets$7.5B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$9.1B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$1.6B$523.2M*
Participants148,96518,619
1-Year Investment Return5.3%*5.2%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorSheet Metal Workers International AssociationIBEW & NECA

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 91/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 8.3 percentage points (82.6% vs 74.3%). Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund covers 148,965 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons