South Carolina Retirement System vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 28.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 55.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.
| Metric | South Carolina Retirement System | Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 52/100 (C) | 80/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 55.1% | 83.8%* |
| Total Assets | $35.5B | $47.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $64.4B | $56.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $28.9B | $9.1B* |
| Participants | 575,000 | 220,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.2% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | high | low |
| Sponsor | State of South Carolina | State of Missouri |
Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 28.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 55.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.