Skip to main content
PensionRisk

State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) vs Deere & Company Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) and Deere & Company Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) grades D while Deere & Company Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 40% vs 124%.

Deere & Company Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) at 40/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 83.6 percentage points (124.0% vs 40.4%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricState Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS)Deere & Company Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
40/100 (D)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
40.4%124.0%*
Total Assets$19.8B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$49.0B$17.0B*
Unfunded Liability$29.2B$0*
Participants152,00083,076
1-Year Investment Return4.5%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelcriticallow
SponsorState of IllinoisJohn Deere

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) at 40/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 83.6 percentage points (124.0% vs 40.4%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons