State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) vs Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 6.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 80.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.
| Metric | State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) | Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 81/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 80.2% | 86.2%* |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $39.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $112.2B | $45.8B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $22.2B | $6.3B* |
| Participants | 507,000 | 385,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 6.6%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Ohio | Texas Counties |
Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 6.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 80.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.