Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs Houston Municipal Employees Pension System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) and Houston Municipal Employees Pension System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) grades A while Houston Municipal Employees Pension System grades C. Funding ratios: 86% vs 58%.

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Houston Municipal Employees Pension System at 55/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 28.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 58.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.

MetricTexas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)Houston Municipal Employees Pension System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
81/100 (A)*55/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
86.2%*58.2%
Total Assets$39.5B$4.5B
Total Liabilities$45.8B$7.7B*
Unfunded Liability$6.3B$3.2B*
Participants385,00028,000
1-Year Investment Return6.6%*5.1%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorTexas CountiesCity of Houston

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Houston Municipal Employees Pension System at 55/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 28.0 percentage points (86.2% vs 58.2%). Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) covers 385,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons