Skip to main content
PensionRisk

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Houston Municipal Employees Pension System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan and Houston Municipal Employees Pension System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: AT&T Pension Benefit Plan grades A while Houston Municipal Employees Pension System grades C. Funding ratios: 94% vs 58%.

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Houston Municipal Employees Pension System at 55/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 35.5 percentage points (93.7% vs 58.2%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

MetricAT&T Pension Benefit PlanHouston Municipal Employees Pension System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*55/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
93.7%*58.2%
Total Assets$30.0B$4.5B
Total Liabilities$32.0B$7.7B*
Unfunded Liability$2.0B*$3.2B
Participants286,35528,000
1-Year Investment Return6.9%*5.1%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorAT&T Inc.City of Houston

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Houston Municipal Employees Pension System at 55/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 35.5 percentage points (93.7% vs 58.2%). AT&T Pension Benefit Plan covers 286,355 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons