Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) and Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) grades B while Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 78% vs 106%.

Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 28.1 percentage points (106.2% vs 78.1%). Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan covers 39,566 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%106.2%*
Total Assets$193.0B$9.8B
Total Liabilities$247.0B$9.2B*
Unfunded Liability$54.0B$0*
Participants1,730,00039,566
1-Year Investment Return6.1%6.7%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasCaterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 28.1 percentage points (106.2% vs 78.1%). Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan covers 39,566 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons