Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) vs Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) and Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) grades B while Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 70% vs 106%.

Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 36.1 percentage points (106.2% vs 70.1%). Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan covers 39,566 participants.

MetricEmployees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
66/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
70.1%106.2%*
Total Assets$31.5B$9.8B
Total Liabilities$44.9B$9.2B*
Unfunded Liability$13.4B$0*
Participants327,00039,566
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.7%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasCaterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 36.1 percentage points (106.2% vs 70.1%). Caterpillar Inc. Retirement Income Plan covers 39,566 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons