Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) vs ExxonMobil Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) and ExxonMobil Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) grades B while ExxonMobil Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 78% vs 114%.

ExxonMobil Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 35.7 percentage points (113.8% vs 78.1%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

MetricTeacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)ExxonMobil Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
72/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
78.1%113.8%*
Total Assets$193.0B$11.4B
Total Liabilities$247.0B$10.0B*
Unfunded Liability$54.0B$0*
Participants1,730,00061,475
1-Year Investment Return6.1%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) at 72/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 35.7 percentage points (113.8% vs 78.1%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons