Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) vs ExxonMobil Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) (A) and ExxonMobil Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 114% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) at 81/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 27.6 percentage points (113.8% vs 86.2%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

MetricTexas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS)ExxonMobil Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
81/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
86.2%113.8%*
Total Assets$39.5B$11.4B
Total Liabilities$45.8B$10.0B*
Unfunded Liability$6.3B$0*
Participants385,00061,475
1-Year Investment Return6.6%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTexas CountiesExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS) at 81/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 27.6 percentage points (113.8% vs 86.2%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons