Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) vs ExxonMobil Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) and ExxonMobil Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) grades B while ExxonMobil Pension Plan grades A. Funding ratios: 70% vs 114%.

ExxonMobil Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 43.7 percentage points (113.8% vs 70.1%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

MetricEmployees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)ExxonMobil Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
66/100 (B)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
70.1%113.8%*
Total Assets$31.5B$11.4B
Total Liabilities$44.9B$10.0B*
Unfunded Liability$13.4B$0*
Participants327,00061,475
1-Year Investment Return5.5%7.4%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of TexasExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) at 66/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 43.7 percentage points (113.8% vs 70.1%). ExxonMobil Pension Plan covers 61,475 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons