Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund (A) and National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 19.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 74.3%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricTeamsters Local 710 Pension FundNational Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*74.3%
Total Assets$55.6B$1.5B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$2.0B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$523.2M*
Participants634,86118,619
1-Year Investment Return4.2%5.2%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTeamsters Local 710IBEW & NECA

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to National Electrical Benefit Fund (NEBF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 19.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 74.3%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons