Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund grades A while United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan grades D. Funding ratios: 94% vs 51%.

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 42.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 51.5%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricTeamsters Local 710 Pension FundUnited Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*49/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*51.5%
Total Assets$55.6B$3.3B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$6.5B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$3.1B*
Participants634,86173,913
1-Year Investment Return4.2%5.0%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowhigh
SponsorTeamsters Local 710UMWA

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan at 49/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 42.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 51.5%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons