Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.6 percentage points (92.1% vs 83.5%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 83/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 92.1%* | 83.5% |
| Total Assets | $57.0B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $61.9B* | $98.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $4.9B* | $16.2B |
| Participants | 378,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.8% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Tennessee | University of California |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to University of California Retirement Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.6 percentage points (92.1% vs 83.5%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.