Virginia Retirement System (VRS) vs Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Virginia Retirement System (VRS) and Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Virginia Retirement System (VRS) grades B while Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A. Funding ratios: 75% vs 94%.
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Virginia Retirement System (VRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 19.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 75.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Virginia Retirement System (VRS) | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B) | 97/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 75.1% | 94.1%* |
| Total Assets | $87.0B | $55.6B |
| Total Liabilities | $115.8B | $59.1B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $28.8B | $3.5B* |
| Participants | 740,000 | 634,861 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 6.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | multiemployer |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Virginia | Teamsters Western Conference |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Virginia Retirement System (VRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 19.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 75.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.