Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) and Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 81% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.9 percentage points (94.1% vs 81.2%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 80/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 81.2% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $51.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $63.1B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $11.9B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 438,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.8% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | State of Illinois |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.9 percentage points (94.1% vs 81.2%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.