Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Maryland State Retirement & Pension System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Maryland State Retirement & Pension System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A while Maryland State Retirement & Pension System grades B. Funding ratios: 94% vs 72%.

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 72.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustMaryland State Retirement & Pension System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*67/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*72.1%
Total Assets$55.6B$61.0B
Total Liabilities$59.1B*$84.6B
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$23.6B
Participants634,861398,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.8%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceState of Maryland

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 72.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More