Skip to main content
PensionRisk

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs Northrop Grumman Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (A) and Northrop Grumman Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 106% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.5 percentage points (106.2% vs 93.7%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

MetricAT&T Pension Benefit PlanNorthrop Grumman Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
93.7%106.2%*
Total Assets$30.0B$18.7B
Total Liabilities$32.0B$17.6B*
Unfunded Liability$2.0B$0*
Participants286,355106,531
1-Year Investment Return6.9%7.3%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorAT&T Inc.Northrop Grumman

Northrop Grumman Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 12.5 percentage points (106.2% vs 93.7%). Northrop Grumman Pension Plan covers 106,531 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons